>>19069
> No, this is how all fiction works and this is fundamental issue with all fiction. which has no fix.
Then stop trying to fix it.

> you who is allergic to any negative emotion no matter how weak it is that's great but I rather prefer wider range of emotions than being stuck in never ever ending euphoria.
I'm not "allergic to any negative emotion", I look for comedy when I want to laugh and look for tragedy when I want to cry. You instead look at my comedy, find no crying and complain.

> it will be same for you as if now somebody wrote tragic story about those twins,(like how they suddenly die during a trip) that you not make you feel sad at all you would juts read it and possibly even jerk off on the tragedy and move to another.
Of course it can make me sad, because I can not only separate fiction from reality, but also one piece of fiction from another, an ability which you not only lack, but it seems you can't even imagine other people having it.

> If on the other hand you use original character then as author you sort of have power to kill them for real
No, you've just established before that all fiction is the same in this regard and it has no fix. Now you're contradicting yourself once again.

> However If that author decided to write any other tragic story with the same characters it would no longer be sad because now they are officially immortal in that story universe.
That is absolutely NOT how a story's universe works. Your understanding of fiction is preposterous.

> maybe read the book "even monkey can draw manga" and check for suggestions of how to make story more appealing to the audience.
I'm not creating stories to appeal to the audience, I create stories because I want them be created. Then the audience appears naturally from the fact that if it appeals to me it will appeal to others with similar taste.

> like if your characters visited Paris in one episode and then you see small photo of them next to Eiffel tower casually hanging on the wall. this is not plot related in any way they don't remember anything about that trip but it is juts for audience to remind that such thing happened in your series.
Just how retarded can you possibly be? You have personally put all those posters on the walls in Dream Gift for me.

Also:
> in your series
It is NOT a fucking series in the sense you're trying to imply here.

> You can't have it both make them think that their life is valuable and make story casual guro that's logically impossible.

Yes I can, writing about impossible things is what fiction is good for in the first place. Otherwise I could just watch the news.
Here:

Len: There's nothing more precious than life.
Rin: I think you and I might have something more precious actually.
Len: Of course, we have each other! I love you more than my own life indeed.
Rin: As I do you. So...
Len: It'd be even funnier if we killed each other!
Rin: Yay!

See, I did this I made them think their life is valuable and made them casually throw it away. If you don't consider it a good story, that's a problem on your end, it doesn't change the fact that I did write it, which clearly establishes the fact that it can be done.

> like the cartoon of road "runner and coyote" or "tom and jerry" "bugs bunny" or even "totally spies"
> Batman and other cartoon episodes are also not some reboots they have some continuity even if they are rather independent episodes.
STOP. TREATING. MY. WORKS. AS. IF. THEY'RE. CHAPTERS. IN. A. BIGGER. STORY. WHEN. THEY. ARE. NOT.

> you do want to transfer something from one episode to another
FOR. FUCK'S. SAKE. THEY. ARE. NOT. EPISODES.

> sooner or later everybody has to wrap up everything into single universe.
No, that is only your own personal idée fixe.
Sane people can live just fine without putting every piece of fiction in the same universe. I don't experience the need to put Taboo in the same continuity as Die Young the same way how I don't experience the need to put Asterix and Obelix: Mission Cleopatra in the same continuity as Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra.