>>25089
Speaking as a janitor, I may very well be mistaken, but I do not think any of those actually
fall into the problematic category. Real porn, even more snuff, CP and such are absolutely prohibited,
100%, no discussion.
The term "photorealistic content" on the other hand is at least open to some interpretation.
In my understanding it means purposely trying to make something look as realistic as possible,
up to a point where the viewer is deceived into believing it's real.

Again, I could be wrong, but none of those threads and the posts within look real to me and what's more,
they don't look as if at any point during their creation anything real could have been involved or used
to help make it. That is a huge distinction in my opinion.

Therefore I won't touch any of these and leave it to more qualified persons.

I do however get the impression, that the post reporting those threads might be a personal crusade, that may or may not have started here:
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=19332&page=1#p13_21779

Being the one that replied to the matter mentioned above, I do however think, that some of the rules -
the one about photorealistic AI being among them - could use a bit of clarification or an addendum or some such.

In this case, the anon who reported the threads may be basically right, at least not obviously wrong.
"photorealistic" could very well mean anything that resembles a photo at all, or that only parts look as if they were real.
That is the other side of the coin. Slap some cat's ears and a tail on a photo, still remains a photo.
There's even apps for such things as most of you will be aware.
Not all content of that kind is equally dangerous to the very existence of the whole board, but if it looks, as if a real photo
could have been modified to create the image or video, that does fall into the category photorealistic AI.

One last thing: The threads mentioned are not that different from many of the other AI threads, so
being consequent and enforcing a very strict interpretation of the rule could mean purging half of the AI board.
I for one do not want that, at all.

In conclusion:
Not touching any of those. Don't think it is necessary.
Someone else might. Some clarification in the matter would be helpful.