Hello, thanks for creating the thread.

The rules are generally simple, but for edge cases, we use a reasonable amount of discretion, sometimes discussing with users or among each other. Though please be understanding if it takes time to get a good answer ^^;

>>25094
It hasn't been updated over 2 years. I quickly updated the links for now, I will get around matching the style later on
Archives were removed (because they are no longer "archives", but carried on to the instance we post on - so no content was lost)

>>25095
>If it is an issue of "getting around to it", do you need help?
The original file is lost so I would have to make it from scratch... I plan to eventually get around it, but I'd gladly take help. Though I'd like to be a bit specific about it so may require some revisions if someone else were to do it
in short, a "is it made with AI" label would placed after "is it 3DCG art?" (because /s/ or /f/ adjacent AI stuff can mainly go on their respective boards. though it's not unseen someone creates a thread and posts few furries, in which case blind eye can be turned - similar on /art/).
photorealistic content (also replying >>25099 here) is banned (unless linked from a 3rd party) to save us from likely headache. It's officially banned, but I'm aware there are some content pushing the limits. To my knowledge, photorealistic AI is not seriously illegal to the point of police knocking our doors, but I've worked with companies that interpret the laws wrongly (or getting pressured by international NGOs) in the past so I'm not entirely confident about being able to keep being as permissive in the future. I can however say that, at least under my administration, there will be no sudden irreversible purges. I'd make them private while a team is uploading the content to a 3rd party host or something... (this is just an idea, and not a plan)