>>25268

> First of all, everyone's hates pedophiles including me honestly .
Are you included in "everyone" or in "pedophiles"? :b
And don't count me as part of "everyone".

Consider this: Today's use of "pedophile" is a misinterpretation. The word derives from latin and literally means loving (…phile) children (pedo…), not abusing them. Hence, in this sense I'm a pedophile and you (and "everyone") should be one too.

And think of this: Most single persons might be rational. But if the same persons are seduced to join a mob they transform into violent cretins. Self-appointed do-gooders take advantage of this and initiate witchhunts that the good old Spanish Inquisition could have dreamed of. And without beeing totally critical of the government I'm pretty sure that under the guise of the anti-pedo-hype it tries to gain total control over us. Orwell and Huxley send their regards.

Apropos misinterpretation: The peace-sign was originally shown as victory-sign. But it wasn't shown because the two raised fingers formed a "V" for victory. When a battle was lost in the old days the archers often got their fingers cut off due to "bad performance". So when they reached home they presented their still attached fingers to signal the victory.


>>25270

> I'll take just a single one just to confirm that […]
Yeah, that's the real reason, of course.
And what would you do if it is a chain of useless textfiles? Complain about the broken promise?
And what would you do if there is really CP? Complain about the bad guys?
And have you really paid for a premium download? That is the only thing these gangsters want you to do.

Sorry to tell you, that you don't act very smart. Otherwise you wouldn't ask such a question and wouldn't come up with such a silly reason.
And you would look at the darknet (not the deepnet) over TOR where you could find content for free instead of climbing a paywall.

To me you look like a wannabe do-gooder. :b