>>25308
> Urination has always been bundled with scat and vomit, so I don't want to create a side board for it. For a site centered around guro, I think this makes the most sense

I get the idea, my only problem with this grouping is the actual scat part of scat is such a big turn off for so many people that a lot of people will skip that whole board rather than sift through /s for urination material they might like. If I weren't doing janitorial work here, I'd keep /s filtered out at all times.

>>25309
> ...since you can create a thread on /s and explicitly exclude scat/vomit. If you set your bookmarks accordingly, you can have an exclusive watersports thread on /s, without ever having to look at scat.

You can do this? If so, I'll have to check that out. Didn't know this was an option.

> AI is an artistic style... while gore, scat, pee, fur and freaky stuff are descriptions of content.

While it does lead to weird conflicts, or at least a need for the posting flowchart to decide when and where style is more or less important than content type, I'm still reasonably comfortable with the boards being a mix of style types and content types.

I think AI stands out in particular as a style because of two things: (1) some people hating AI "slop", and wanting nothing to do with it, and (2) unlike most other styles, the AI board often has a lot of "how to" discussion. I myself really like using the AI board to talk about how I'm creating my work, and to get tips from other people on using AI.

Just a general comment I'd like to add: I used to think "guro" was a Japanese take on the English word "gore", but I found out later that "guro" comes from the word "grotesque".

With that in mind, I think it's fair to say that guro isn't just gore, but it can be a lot of different things that scare or repulse "normal" people, but is a turn on for others.