In ur mom's pussy Now kindly fuck off

>>17633

Wasn't that one of the Kolyma-hosted sites? Or am I thinking of something else? Kolyma ceased to exist about a year ago anyway.

You could try https://watchpeopledie.tv/ which doesn't ban such material.

>>17648
>Wasn't that one of the Kolyma-hosted sites?
Yes, but so was gurochan

KAGUYAAAAAA BRING BACK GORECHAN NOOOOOOW

>>17656
Gurochan exists in a very precarious legal grey area and there are some companies that will host it.

Gorechan's content is flat-out illegal in most of the world and only the shadiest of fly-by-night hosting companies would even dream of touching it.

I believe it's not just a problem of finding hosts, but also domain registrars who can get twitchy about such things.

>>17658
Do you think we can make Gurochan the 4chan of gore? There are many gore threads on 4chan a website which has regularly 100s of 1000s of users every day and millions every month.

Its clearnet domain got seized 3 times in a span of like 2 months (by self-proclaimed "lax" registrars) before we made it TOR-only, and it was facing legal issues even then on.
I enjoyed administrating it but I doubt I'll ever bring it back, especially that I don't have some company behind me anymore.
It would only be back if an anonymous gore fetishist gets a server and self-hosts it on TOR.
>>17658
GUROchan is all fictional and bans realistic AI, so it's clearly legal, at least in the USA. Gorechan was the one in grey area, we were trying to keep it "barely not illegal".

>>17688
I've been considering hosting it. It's not illegal in most of the world, actually. It's easy enough to use the same registrars that other gore sites use and to know how to pacify NCMEC when one of their bots gets a conniption by seeing too much skin on a dead midget.

>>18793
pls do

Ireslly want to see videos of adorable baby animals, especially kittens monkeys, terrified and shit, anyone mnow where I can grab that I can't find the right channels

>>18802
If by "channels" you're referring to Telegram, stay away from it. Public channels are not encrypted and it is not safe.

Do you think we can fuse Gurochan and Gorechan?

>>18808
i’d rather not. plenty of people are into illustrated guro exclusively and would be turned off by proximity to “the real thing.” and it’d suck for gurochan (which has stayed up fairly consistently for the past year, iirc) to get pulled down by a hosting and/or legal kerfuffle. this is coming from someone who likes real gore, btw, so i have no vendetta or anything.

it's not a matter of users getting turned off, but real thing simply being harder to host.

>>18793
Gorechan had child gore with barely mosaic-ed genitalia. That's probably a little illegal, but I dunno legals
It could be banned, but then the question of where to draw the line would rise

>>18818
Why not make a seperate board? 4chan has /gif/ for the real thing and everywhere else for drawn or generated.
>>18821
Draw the line at Japan's AoC.

>>18793
By all means, please do! There needs to be gore board again that's actually good.

>>19046
*a gore board, my bad