[Return] [Bottom]

This thread is locked!

It cannot be replied to at this time.

As of writing there is illegal pornography in the catalog on /g/ and /s/. Since there's no report button I thought I should let any mod seeing this know.
Viewing last 50 posts
>>
Cp on g
>>
Cp on all posts
>>
https://boards.guro.cx/3dcg/koko.php?res=56693

This thread has been at the top of the board for weeks now, almost around the clock.
At the moment, it contains 866 posts (ignoring deleted), 33 of which are images/videos.
5 of those are not related to guro at all, another 6 barely, leaving 22, a meager 2,55%.
GUROchan is an image board after all.

Now, if the conversation was contributing to the board in any way, that wouldn't be as annoying,
but the vast majority of entries is pure drivel. Jabbering and babbling on, interrupted by flaming.

we got /dis for discussions
we got a chatroom
at the very least one can use the sage function, that is what it is for.
"Typing sage into the email field prevents the thread from being bumped.
This is used when you are not posting something that portrays to the topic of the thread."

If it would be possible for someone with authority, to politely say something in the matter,
that would surely be appreciated by a lot of those members not particularly interested in
that specific topic. You can ignore it only for so long, if it's right in your face, all the time.
>>
>>25073
50 useless comments and 4 sorry pics later still striving for the crown of most annoying thread ever
topping the board nonstop with blather
>>
>>25073
>>25078

It's all said - only not by everyone yet. ;)
>>
>>
Please start enforcing the rules that you created for realistic ai. There is literally thread called various realistic ai on /ai that is up for 4 month and multiple other where you can't make any arguments that it is sort of 3d look, like multiple dolcet threads that are as realistic as it gets.

Multiple threads:
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=16208&page=1
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=21829&page=1
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=21822&page=1
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=21586&page=1
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=21499&page=1
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=21283&page=1
>>
>>25089
Speaking as a janitor, I may very well be mistaken, but I do not think any of those actually
fall into the problematic category. Real porn, even more snuff, CP and such are absolutely prohibited,
100%, no discussion.
The term "photorealistic content" on the other hand is at least open to some interpretation.
In my understanding it means purposely trying to make something look as realistic as possible,
up to a point where the viewer is deceived into believing it's real
.

Again, I could be wrong, but none of those threads and the posts within look real to me and what's more,
they don't look as if at any point during their creation anything real could have been involved or used
to help make it. That is a huge distinction in my opinion.

Therefore I won't touch any of these and leave it to more qualified persons.

I do however get the impression, that the post reporting those threads might be a personal crusade, that may or may not have started here:
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=19332&page=1#p13_21779

Being the one that replied to the matter mentioned above, I do however think, that some of the rules -
the one about photorealistic AI being among them - could use a bit of clarification or an addendum or some such.

In this case, the anon who reported the threads may be basically right, at least not obviously wrong.
"photorealistic" could very well mean anything that resembles a photo at all, or that only parts look as if they were real.
That is the other side of the coin. Slap some cat's ears and a tail on a photo, still remains a photo.
There's even apps for such things as most of you will be aware.
Not all content of that kind is equally dangerous to the very existence of the whole board, but if it looks, as if a real photo
could have been modified to create the image or video, that does fall into the category photorealistic AI.

One last thing: The threads mentioned are not that different from many of the other AI threads, so
being consequent and enforcing a very strict interpretation of the rule could mean purging half of the AI board.
I for one do not want that, at all.

In conclusion:
Not touching any of those. Don't think it is necessary.
Someone else might. Some clarification in the matter would be helpful.
>>
>>25089 >>25090
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=15061&page=1#p13_21856

now that is on the borderline. (photorealistic AI)
Still not deleting it, because of the typical crappy AI-eye (only the left) and mostly the physics.
She wouldn't be able to hang like this, if it was real. But it is a case of someone trying purposely to make an image
look as realistic as possible with content that could be endangering the very existence of the whole board.
In my opinion that should be reprimanded. Not by me though, above my pay-grade.

Hint: Just to make it clear that you are not trying to get GUROchan in trouble (which is always a possibility by the way),
leave some very obvious AI parts in the image and do not try to make it look as realistic as possible.
Or upload elsewhere and post a link.
>>
>>25089
>>25090
https://boards.guro.cx/ai/koko.php?res=16208
This is my thread, my goal is not to make photo realistic gore same as gore websites have, but instead to make Guro art, i think there is a significant difference. Also i made various anime guro images in other threads, with less details, it is same approach just more detailed, but in first place it starts as an artwork, anyway, janitor, can you rename my thread into "FleashReaper's Art" or i can make new thread without word "photorealistic" because it's not a photorealistic gore for the sake of gore itself. don't want to misguide people.
>>
>>25100
you're good, I think. I was going to single out your thread from the ones mentioned, as the one being completely fine in my book,
but that is just my personal opinion and wouldn't be fair to the others. I may also be biased, because I like your work.
And I would never act on bias. Since you made the effort to react here, it shows you care, so you should at least know that, for now.

>make Guro art, i think there is a significant difference
me too.

>can you rename my thread into "FleashReaper's Art"
In my opinion, that is a good idea. However, a janitor can not do that.
Delete, leave a comment or issue a warning, that's about it. Mostly keep the house clean.
Only a full mod or administrator can rename and move stuff, as well as other more advanced operations, afaik.

Those guys are very busy and we'll have to wait patiently until one of them finds the time to look into the issue
how far the term "photorealistic" actually extends. Maybe nothing at all happens. Worst case, everything too close to a real photo has to go.
Knowing the board since the beginning of the old Gurochan, I estimate the second outcome as extremely unlikely.

btw.: you can always set a password for deletion while posting and in case of an error delete your own post.
that also works with a whole thread, but yours is already filled and it would be shame. Just wait for a mod to rename it.
In the future, let's say you made a typo while creating a new thread, you can delete it yourself and create a new one.
>>
There's cp spam at least in ai art and 3D
>>
The cp spam is back on at least on 3d, ai, art, and fur
>>
The cp spam keeps coming back oddly
>>
>>25100
>>25101
>Those guys are very busy [...]
>Worst case, everything [...] has to go. Knowing the board [...] extremely unlikely.

https://boards.guro.cx/dis/koko.php?res=25092&page=1#p6_25109
>[...] please be understanding if it takes time to get a good answer
>[...] photorealistic content [...] there will be no sudden irreversible purges [...]

already got an answer, good for now. *phew!* as I said, "extremely unlikely".
>>
CP dropping in several categories
>>
CP in all boards
>>
Art, ai, and 3d have cp spam
>>
CP on g / s / fur / art / ai / 3dcg
>>
Cp on all posts delete quick
>>
CP spam across all boards.
>>
CP spam is everywhere
>>
Confirming CP/CSAM spam across all posts except /f/ and /rp/
>>
>>25149
Again, but only on /g/,/s/,/fur/,/art/, and /3dcg/
>>
There's cp spam now in fur, art, ai, and 3d and maybe elsewhere too
>>
The cp spam is back on fur, art, ai, and 3D
>>
Cp ad back on 4 posts
>>
CP back in all boards
>>
CP on 3dcg, ai, art, fur, s and g !!
>>
Cp spam everywhere now
>>
The cp spam is back everywhere.
>>
CP still on most boards
>>
If Cp is illegal than Gore stuffs are illegal too whether it 2d 3d or art or else. Anyone can share anything, whether it cp, gore, Or etc. As long as it only link. This my opinion what you guys think?
>>
>>25265
My opinion is that you are a sociopath. You should kill yourself before you harm innocent children. you fucking piece of shit.
>>
First of all, everyone's hates pedophiles including me honestly . Second of all watch your tongue. Third of all don't pretend too innocent, I know why you are here, So moral of the story is Don't Disrespect Nobody. Peace ✌
>>
Ok but real talk does anyone have the passwords to the rars? I'll take just a single one just to confirm that you aren't just infinitely a text file that gives you the link to another text file.
>>
Cp back on most posts
>>
CP again in all boards.
>>
>>25268

> First of all, everyone's hates pedophiles including me honestly .
Are you included in "everyone" or in "pedophiles"? :b
And don't count me as part of "everyone".

Consider this: Today's use of "pedophile" is a misinterpretation. The word derives from latin and literally means loving (…phile) children (pedo…), not abusing them. Hence, in this sense I'm a pedophile and you (and "everyone") should be one too.

And think of this: Most single persons might be rational. But if the same persons are seduced to join a mob they transform into violent cretins. Self-appointed do-gooders take advantage of this and initiate witchhunts that the good old Spanish Inquisition could have dreamed of. And without beeing totally critical of the government I'm pretty sure that under the guise of the anti-pedo-hype it tries to gain total control over us. Orwell and Huxley send their regards.

Apropos misinterpretation: The peace-sign was originally shown as victory-sign. But it wasn't shown because the two raised fingers formed a "V" for victory. When a battle was lost in the old days the archers often got their fingers cut off due to "bad performance". So when they reached home they presented their still attached fingers to signal the victory.


>>25270

> I'll take just a single one just to confirm that […]
Yeah, that's the real reason, of course.
And what would you do if it is a chain of useless textfiles? Complain about the broken promise?
And what would you do if there is really CP? Complain about the bad guys?
And have you really paid for a premium download? That is the only thing these gangsters want you to do.

Sorry to tell you, that you don't act very smart. Otherwise you wouldn't ask such a question and wouldn't come up with such a silly reason.
And you would look at the darknet (not the deepnet) over TOR where you could find content for free instead of climbing a paywall.

To me you look like a wannabe do-gooder. :b
>>
CP in most threads
>>
>>25273
So instead call someone that post those illegal stuff a sexual predator. Got it.
>>
someone's posting cp, again
>>
CP spam in G-3D
>>
Cp posts popping up again saw it in artwork right now
>>
The cp spam is back in fur, art, ai, and 3d at least
>>
Cp in ai and 3d
>>
Please use the report feature to report posts instead of this thread.

If you would like to discuss rules as an open discussion then you can create new threads for your topic

locking thread.

[Top]

Delete post: []