https://loli3.net/l/ for an imageboard

>>15789

Thank you for the info. I was wondering what happened.

>>15790
its gone…

Why will/did Lolicit go down permanently? What happened to Lolicit? There is no information publicly available.

>>19436
It was a site for hosting material that is illegal on a pretty large portion of the planet and not something you want to be publicly associated with even where it is allowed. Not really a great mystery to be had there.

>>19437
That's bullshit. Don't spread misinfo. It went down because someone hacked it and stole the SQL database. The admin's didn't know how much info was taken and they weren't comfortable setting it back up, and they threw in the towel. It has nothing to do with illegal content.

>>19436
>>19437
>>19486
Knowing the overwhelming majority of gore fans absolutely hate loli we really really need to give them their own board like /ai/ but for the minority of guro fans who like loli.

>>19491
Minority? Most guro lovers either like it or are ambivalent about it, and most guro threads contain a healthy mix of loli and non-loli content. Gurochan in particular has a community that is particularly appreciative of lolicon, much more than other fetish communities.

This is contrasted with something like scat where people either love it or hate it, and scat lovers tend to prefer entire threads dedicated to it. Maybe you're talking about Reddit's r/guro which does hate loli, but on imageboards, the overwhelming majority of guro fans do not "absolutely hate" lolicon. You may hate it, but the community, by and large, does not.

Back when I was admin, the reason why we never made a loli board is specifically because so many people like loli but not exclusively that creating a board would actually reduce the amount of content people post. That is still the argument today.

>>19437
Actually, guro (or rather, depictions of extreme sexual violence) is also illegal in many of the places that ban lolicon.

Being anti-loli while being pro guro has to be one of the stupidest positions one can hold.

>>19499
It's extremely common everywhere else so I'm in a bit of a pickle.
>>19495
There are grey areas like blood. For some reason even the most anti gore fag likes blood and hit marks.
>>19494
You see some anons are discussing how to save image boards from obscurity and one very big reason is one or more of the following three things aren't seperated into their own containment space.
Furry, scat, and loli.
I'm kinda winging it without asking others for help because I don't want /gif/ here.
>reddit
Ironically they love loli they just say they don't but they post it as soon as moderators are gone.

>>19516
It's really strange when you show up to spam this thoroughly discredited nonsense on here, being the only person on earth who pretends not to heavily associate guro -- and especially gurochan with loli, there's subsequently a rash of CP spam. Do you think your posting illegal material makes your retarded point any less untrue, that somehow threatening the security of the site will make people who like guro dislike loli instead of universally loving it as they do in reality?

>>19517
First off I'm from 4chan and there's A LOT I'm talking tens of thousands of potential users and donors asking to make our website less suspicious and second off "discredited" means nothing. There was also a writer who didn't want to be suspicious.
Third off is this some weird reverse psychology thing where you accuse lovers of endangering a community? Honestly I have only seen this on Reddit or "Leddit" as we call it.

>>19518
Lovers? You clearly hate this site otherwise you wouldn't be posting CP nor trying to get loli banned.

>>19521
Yes, lovers! In what world do you live where even loli-free websites don't get targetted with illegal shit?

>>19518
You're clearly not from 4chan, every single user there loves loli. Anyone who says they don't is just a redditor pretending, you're probably from one of those '4chan' reddit forums, probably why you think being 'from 4chan' means anything. Banning loli only makes a website more 'suspicious', if they ban loli there's a 100% chance they'll also ban guro, the two are inherently linked. Nowhere that bans loli isn't constantly on the edge of also banning guro, and vice versa, they're practically the same thing. There'd be no reason for 'thousands' of 'donors' to come here if it was to ban loli porn, it's the main draw of guro and gurochan.

>>19523
If you were a lover you wouldn't be trying to shut the site down, an inevitable consequence of banning loli. It's clear you'd stoop to these kind of means, since no one else buys your "there are guro lovers that don't like loli" disproven bullshit.

>>19524

>"there are guro lovers that don't like loli" disproven bullshit

What? I like guro and not loli, I guess I don't exist then. I agree that trying to ban loli on a guro site is sus though, as if guro needed to be "respectable".

>>19524
We call this faggot the 4chan troll because that is what he claims to be. He is trying to attack loli for years now, with the same BS wrapped in different foil. He is in reality a desperate moralfaggot. Funny how he is now necrofagging a dead anouncement thread:P Best option is to ignore him

>>19524
>every single user there loves loli
No they don't. Only /b/ allows loli openly and everywhere else you can only post links so mods can say >"See? Not our responsibility anymore."
>if they ban loli there's a 100% chance they'll also ban guro
No they won't. Only /gif/ allows gore openly and they're one of the biggest anti-loli forces on the entire Internet.
>no reason for 'thousands' of 'donors' to come here
You're forgetting thounsands of users more because this is my main interest. More activity!
>an inevitable consequence of banning loli
No it's not. My original idea was to rename boards to prank new users and give lol's its own safe place from the get go in order to get /gif/ anons off our back.
>>19574
You know there's more than anon from there right? It's there I found out we're back and nobody in their right mind calls a channer a "moralfaggot".
>>19561
Haha.
>>19573
I'm going to be honest. Waiting a whole week for 3.5 posts sucks! We're slow and I hate it. And the only way out I know of is make the interested anons not get turned off by unlinked lol's.

>>19617
None of what you says changes that you're a massive faggot and hypocrite. Kys.

Get a room you two

>>19625
Been telling them this since I first realized this whole "debate" was just two guys in deep denial about their feelings for each other, but so far no luck.

Little Angels is gone too. Thankfully I saved a lot of stuff from their threads over the years.
They were a good archive of a lot of classic puni images from the early aughts, but I wished they weren't so picky about fetishes. Scat and guro being banned from there really blows, because a lot of loli guro and scat has been lost to time.

>>19622
No you.
>>19625
>>19629
Actually I had one! But someone wanted the door locked. Hmmmmmm.

Now all the fallen is down where is there to see any loli guro, this really sucks, where do I go now?

>>19684
Please tell me it's temporary

>>19687
It is. They got DDOS'd, and they're currently working on getting everything back up and running.

>>19688
They got ddos'ed for several days in a row. It's down till further notice. Once it's clear the attacks stopped and the owner has time to put it back up.
It's insane the lengths people will go to kill something they don't like

>>19690
Fucking hell, God forbid people enjoy themselves in ways that harm no one. 🙄

>>19690
its probably the sharty. they hate us too

Atf is mostly back up. It still has some buggy periods. No doubt the unrelenting ddos attack clogging up things.

>>19707
its down again

>>19708
I just saw.
Looks like it may be awhile. Hosting is always a challenge for edge content.