On which note, I'm pretty sure
>>1389 and
>>1391
are more just general "little penis, uncircumcised" than dickless, or even docked. Certainly I've seen the original of 1389 and it's just heavily censored rather than implying anything out of the ordinary (...so far as shota+pegging is concerned anyhow).

The latter at least should be more convincingly modifiable though.