>>6594
That was my bad, apparently my formulation wasn't as clear as I thought; I was indeed requesting more details to that basic outline. Also I seem to have missed your thread so far, totally gonna check it out.

>>6610
Tbh, those are really vague and mostly useless. I'm always happy to oblige, but try to think of actual scenarios or at least a few more specifics, including the victim/s. Especially consensual stuff (which can't get away with "random murder/execution" like non-con) needs some details and a good motivation to work.