>>7303
> in that rate population will turn to zero in no time.
I don't think I specified any rate, be it rate of birth or rate of chldren termination so there is no "that rate". If, say, each family has 3 children and only 1 of 3 dies before having their own children, that perfectly works. Or if each family has 5 children, among which 1 would have themselves terminated after a lecture, 1 would have themselves terminated on a random day, and 1 would die in a careless accident, leaving 2 to make it into adulthood and make their own children, that would perfectly work too.

> it was a method to control overpopulation
Okay, I probably wasn't clear enough on that. The government has children volunteer to be terminated instead of just forcing abortions, because the sosciety belives this is the right way to do it. Not the other way around.

> my idea was that it happens just as form of playing without any thinking about consequences.
I'm totally fine with that, just named some more options.

> but this is not actually good thing so parents should scold kids for this.
But isn't this "giving too much meaning" and making it less casual?
At least for me the ending where the parents come and see one child has killed or castrated the other and only scold them for the mess and blood sounds like a good way to point out how casual the death or castration itself is. Besides, if it's not stated that it is normal in this sosciety from the start of the story, it makes a nice twist in the end.

> very bureaucratic. and this ocficcial setting signing waivers waiting in line dealing with sadistic doctor is quite a turn off for me.
I didn't meant it to be bureaucratic at all. I mean, if it's my dream world, guro and sex aside, can I at least imagine healthcare system not buried in bureaucracy? Any boy can just come and say they want to be castrated, it's not considered to be a big enough deal to sign lots of papers and such, he doesn't even have to let his parents know or have their agreement (as no one would see a reason not to agree anyway), they would probably just ask for a name. And it's not so frequently asked for to make you wait in line, and certainly the doctor performing it isn't any bit sadistic, they're a kind person who loves children and this is why they chose this job to work with children and provide the kind of operation they want.

> the reason of castration shoud be something very comical like boy gets scolded for displaying his penis in public and he decided that it is nuisance.
Again, totally fine with that.

> In case of playing doctor they are just curious to see what is inside his ballsack. so it is not completely voluntary, but lightly coercive in form "I will show you mine you will show me your's".
I don't really like how "not completely voluntary" sounds, but if you mean it in a way that while he doesn't seek for his balls to be cut off, he doesn't really mind it either, then sure, sounds fine with me.

> if you treat that as favor it implies that it was somewhat bad to have balls so it is no longer so casual.
It's not exactly bad to have balls, just this particular boy doesn't want to.
For example, in the real world some people color their blond hair into dark, but it doesn't mean having blond hair is bad.

> another idea is that kids while playing stuff something important in the girls vagina and then must use knife to take it out.
That sounds just fine too.

Again, don't take it on your account, I'm not critisizing your ideas, just elaborating on mine, pointing where they're different and where they're similar. After all, this thread is to throw in ideas and hope that someone picks them up, so it's for whomever picks it up to decide if they like your approach or mine better.