[Return]

Report a post

Preview
>>9373
As per request, or more like two requests (>>9201 and >>9209), merged into one as they were based off the same original idea. This one mostly speaks for itself, I think, except I'm not entirely sure how the batch of initial/expository dialogue turned out, but that's secondary anyways, isn't it? Sorry for the bit of a wait, I was away on vacation for the last ten days, so I didn't get much writing done (that other request I still have is gonna be done soon too).

>>9254 Thank you for your kind words, it's always nice to be appreciated, and I'm glad to be part of this community too :)

As always, thanks for reading, hope you enjoyed, give me some feedback/criticism/requests.
Post number No.9374
Board Literature
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.