>>16703
>>16704
In fact, I would go as far to say, that if you have other ideas, I wouldn't mind hearing them. (I'll make a special exception for you!)

In general, most ideas I've heard from others have been too fantastical, and not at all practical. Or desperately complex contraptions. I like simple, singular functions for the machines. Also, I have to be able to describe them accurately and succinctly which, as you've discovered, isn't always all that easy. But yours seems that it could actually be built, and that's a big turn on for me.