>>20922
I'm not saying no one here is lying about their gender, but I do feel like that's a bit of a false equivalency. It's much easier to identify someone by their voice than by their writing style, and it's much harder to dispute a recording of our voice than a sample of text since the latter is much easier to forge than the former. For confidentiality reasons, it makes sense that people would be much more hesitant to record their voice.

(But, again, I agree with you that the probability of at least 1 lady here being a guy in disguise is quite high).