>>14750
And I do not object.
This is why I say that I do not demand you to do anything tp please anyone, while there are some people who are accusing me of making demands to you to please me.

>"Now after all that thinking and seeing it from another perspective, I actually like your idea even more." And then that lead to us making the Dream Gift together. So what the hell happened to that?

At that time I Just assumed that you don't know how to write story properly and that just by adding some mystery, intrigues conflicts plot twists, jokes and other typical stuff, it can be made totally decent.
But rather than that you made everything straight as a light beam, and you are refusing even to do proper collaboration where we are supposed to write story together rather than you doing everything your way and refusing to change even even slightest details.

And in result even If quality that dream gift story was pretty much highest of all I ever made in terms of graphic and presentation(with your editing of course), It received no response at all. Posting some horses ass picture woud give you better results.
For me it looks like and obvious failure and you should take that into account and do something different in the future.

Also I woud love to see some response about that dream gift story from someone even now, but Not even that WhiteKnight fan of yours took 3 minutes of his time to say something about that story.

But just look, our this conversation is getting more response than year long work LOL Looks like arguing of far more productive than writing stories :)

>You're having it completely backward.
"dying for fun -> not getting fun because dead -> that's what makes it so fun" and it does not work like that and you even said it wrong, because YOUR logic was killing themselves to *have* fun after they die which is absolute nonsense unless they expect some afterlife.
Dying for fun means that you just don't care what will happen after you die there is no loop of any kind you had your fun while dying or before dying and that's it. and this is exactly my principle where character die for fun rather than expecting to have fun when they are dead.

IN principle your characters are either absolutely retarded or very overt masochists who deliberately hurt themselves, just like in that dream gift story where they do everything to ruin themselves and cause each other as much suffering as possible because as real masochists they enjoy that suffering.

>Let me ask you, have you read my short story "Marina"? Give it a try, it's very short an won't take much of your time. Are you able to get what makes it fun?
no I did not where I can find it

>They can't be objectively bad when there are people who go as far as calling them the best they've read.
Just because someone said they are best means nothing. Your stories go in no comparison with stories of Edward Hyde and some other writers who know great techniques to manipulate readers emotions or express how characters feel and make readers to thinks about those characters what they want them to think.
Even ignoring the plot and content your writing techniques are pretty horrible. (although not sure if that's accidental or deliberate) as you don't don't anything to manipulate reader into feelling what they should feel.


>My stories fully consist of the characters' emotions and motivations, with all the jokes and meanings of those, and only have a sprinkle of action just because those emotions and motivations have to be about something.

No, that's just your delusion. Maybe this was your intention but if so you absolutely fail to express that.
If you insist on me being wrong we have to take some of your story and examone it line by line where you explain what you were trying to achieve by writing one or another sentence. and how well it worked