>>17603
Have you read The Metamorphosis of Prime Intellect?

In that universe people become functionally immortal and to pass the time they find torturous ways to almost die.

>>17606
You mean somebody invented my "boring summer" story ages ago? LOL
but that the whole fun of being immortal that you have absolute freedom without any responsibility death and torture becomes fun.
suffering becomes one of many experiences that are all equally meaningless and same.

I've reimagined the pear of anguish.
I present to you: the strawberry of anguish,
All the torture of the original, in a small, ear canal sized package. Sold In a 3 pack. Also works for breaking toes and noses.

We also have the eyescreamers. Similar idea but designed to fit around the eye, in the socket. So you can crack their face open, but they still can watch it happen. I suppose if your into gaping, it could find other uses...

I suppose a strawberry of anguish would work too, if you don't mind blinding them first.

My vote is for the arm cruncher

"The giant screen across from us allowed the fans -who had packed the stadium- to see close�ups taken from cameras located all round the stadium, the game starting out with the usual animal sacrifices to the players and ending with the immolation of the head cheer leader.
She might have been an android, and certainly seemed to have approached the long-blades of the killer bot without coercion, but the blood and writhing looked pretty real on the screen from which I turned in revulsion. Even though I averted my eyes, it was impossible not to listen to her amplified screams and the revolting roar of the fans. Finally, the preliminary sacrifices and fanfare were over and the ten-foot-tall players in their chrome armor came tromping onto the field."
(Antigrav Unlimited by Duncan Long)

You asked an interesting question.

I've been curious for a long time about what the killer bot in the quoted text might be like.
It's easy to imagine a cheerleader but a robot requires imagination.

A humanoid robot? A real human executioner would be more practical and versatile.
An R2D2-like robot with blades sticking out of his head? It's more ridiculous than scary.

My best idea is a tentacled machine with blades. The blades pushed in slowly leave time for screaming.

Comment too long, view post No.19555 to see the full comment.

Maybe a privacy frontend like Invidious etc

Why would you need to? Genuine curiosity.

>>19511
some try to go Tor-only for whatever personal reason they may have

>>19344
GC started as a 4chan spinoff (one of the first of its kind). Back then, 4chan was pretty cool, so there was no need for millions of alternative imageboards like there are nowadays. The only demographics who needed spinoffs were perverts like us. And furries.
After moot banned guro on 4chan, this site was founded by a few faggots on irc, and the .net iteration of the site remained on the web for a long time.
When gurochan had launched, there was a steady flow of guro porn being produced on the internet. Tons of websites for dark sexual fantasies were already well established, but this was the 2000s; original internet art was in its prime, and new macabre doujinshi manga imported from japan were always being scanned by groups who would share them, for free, on sites like this, and the adjacent forums.
Taboo fetishes like scat and bodymod were shunned and banned from /d/ on 4chan, so fans of that stuff were allowed to stay here too, on /s/ and /f/.
Over time, the production of new guro slowed down. Futaba, which was the only other imageboard that had guro boards, started cracking down on guro, and fads like jissouseki died out (that's a history lesson for another day... actually, just do your own fucking research, I'm tired)
anyhow, gc shuts down around 2013 or 14 because the owners either got v& or addicted to heroin, and some new chumps took over not too long after. the new iteration of the site stays up for some time, but eventually that one shuts down too. you'll notice some of the earlier threads on /dis/ are quite hostile; that's because the last owners of the site said "uh guys, we're gonna ban most of the guro here because our webhost asked us to lol". That was the same excuse moot gave everyone on 4chan in 2004.
A few shitty owners thereafter, the new guy we have now is pretty cool. Except for when he doesnt make backups and tryhard raiders flood the boards and erase years' worth of content.

>Futaba, which was the only other imageboard that had guro boards, started cracking down on guro
I don't think this was the case, their nijiura boards were spammed with guro and they created a dedicated 2D guro board on 2002/03/14. It's still there, although always in a vandalized state: https://cgi.2chan.net/o/
There is another (alt) board for 2D guro created on 2010/07/31 too, stuff like jissou go there: https://jun.2chan.net/51/

>except for when he doesnt make backups and tryhard raiders flood the boards and erase years' worth of content.
Not to say it's any more acceptable, but less than 1 year of content was deleted from only one board during that raid

>>19351
Lots of guro art is still being made, its just mostly stuck behind paywalls like fanbox/fantia/skeb, or on private forums and discord servers where users are vetted. Its just way too easy to get account banned online these days for artists to just freely post guro.

There's some history here too:

https://boards.guro.cx/dis/res/12495.html

Hi! Welcome to GC.

>>19325
I'd get close to her and shoot through the both of us somewhere in the stomach or boobs or maybe in the mouth but that has the risk of instakilling one of us

Shoot one of the sadistic fucks who put me in this situation.

I'd eat her pussy while she expires, continuing to enjoy her body afterwards until the guards come in. Before using the gun to smear my brain across the ceiling, I'd ask the guards to use my daughter and me for their pleasure until we're too rotten to be of use.

>>19325
I'd grab onto my daughter and try to break her neck. Maybe climb onto her so her neck is taking both our weight? Bounce up and down a little? Even if it doesn't break her neck, it'll tighten up the noose real good and make her suffer less. Then shoot myself. Course I'd rather shoot the fuckers who are forcing this, but thats probably bulletproof glass

what, do you have some kind of fetish for dirty houses? i don’t live in filth but i do have some laundry lying on the ground right now. is that tantalizing for you?

So THIS is where the one remaining Asmongold fan hangs out...

>>19234
Who?

>>19234
LMAOOOO

I think the line between them is blurry. The Disney movie makes any research on the idea impossible.
I think a dissection is more about exposing the internal organs, where being turned inside out includes the bones and veins in your limbs

>>19054
by being turned inside out I imagine something like Jolyne Kujo in her fight with C-Moon from JoJo

From the perspective of topology, getting turned inside out has no cutting or non-continuos transformations where a vivisection would require cutting or other non-continuous operations. What it would look like would depend on what you consider the "inside" of a person.

funny to see this ancient thread get bumped. anyway. if necrophilia is your only goal, then you don’t need to look further than the americas. a small-town funeral director position is where it’s at, and i speak (loosely) from experience. i grew up in a tiny town with a family-run funeral home, and the owner was both the county coroner and the one who handled all the embalming. so, in cases of ordinary, inconspicuous death, they’d be there from the time that person was pronounced dead to the time that that person went in the ground (or a casket, at least). you could do anything in that time, as long as the embalming still got properly done.

i seriously contemplated going into mortuary work for a time and was even on fairly close terms with the director (although, i didn’t think they were a necrophiliac). things didn’t work out however. but, maybe this idea could prove useful to someone else.

I've never studied the individual moral guidelines of African communities, but I'm pretty sure on average, they respect the dead. Everyone knows each other, because they all live next to each other in their own little tight nit villages and whatnot.
As far as punishment for sex stuff goes, they'll castrate an unmarried couple for fornicating; what makes you think they won't lop your balls off for fucking a corpse?

>>18918
I would think even rural small town funeral homes/mortuaries these days have CCTV so getting handsy with a cute dead body would still net some risk. Not that I'm an expert on the regulations and legal requirements.

>>18959
ymmv. this was circa the mid-90s and i know for a fact that they didn’t even have a cooler to keep the bodies in (again, tiny town, not a lot of deaths, they’d get embalmed nearly as soon as they died unless there was a religious exemption). so i highly doubt that they had cctv back then either.

>>18959
There's a difference between being recorded and being caught on camera. Most security cams aren't even CHECKED unless a crime has already been reported, to say nothing of how few are actively watched. Cameras tend to go either to a security office and/or to an off-site server farm. In the latter case, there's going to be like four people in charge of 50,000 live feeds, and their job isn't paying attention, it's making sure the video is going into the hard drives in case it's needed later. In the former, in a one-man operation, the "security office" is most likely the mortician's work PC.
All you have to do is not give anyone involved a reason to check the security cameras. Hell, the camera layout might not even be good, then you can have your fun in a blind spot for extra security.

As for the original question, just because a society doesn't have CCTV's and well-equipped police doesn't mean you can get away with anything. If there's a lot of dead bodies around, it's either a warzone or a plague zone and you don't want to stick your dick in someone who just died of Ebolaids. As for making your own, most bush communities are low-trust as fuck, ESPECIALLY around foreigners. You go to one of those tribes and there will be someone around to keep an eye on you 24/7. And as mentioned, village girls tend to travel in packs to ward off rapists and cranky hippotami. Also, getting caught (or even suspected) might result in you getting burnt alive, because mob justice makes the American prison system look like a resort chain. People who do that are usually full-on gangs who go to other tribes to grab multiple girls at a time.
The pros go to Central America. Yeah, you might get kidnapped and have and ear cut off by a dude who looks like his dad was an industrial paint mixing machine, but there's an endless stream of migrants with zero documentation. The Guatemalan authorities don't give a fuck about the Venezuelan transient's camp with 5,000 people in it because none of those pendejos pay taxes, every third male is a gang member, and the girls are ruining the local prostitution economy. Get to know the area well enough and take a few risks and you can probably experience the aftermath of some chick misusing heroin, or create one.

>>18107
>>18368
as a maso. guy, for some reason if I had-to-had some slice sliced off me and eaten by a woman, Id rather it be a milf. or even a bit older+milf than a young woman, even tho I generally don't crave mature women much.
Dunno why, Im sure any psychologist would have a field day, or week , with me if I tried to explain this.

>>18459
>as a maso. guy, for some reason if I had-to-had some slice sliced off me and eaten by a woman, Id rather it be a milf. or even a bit older+milf than a young woman, even tho I generally don't crave mature women much.
I kinda get that, I'm not into cannibalism, but if it had to happen, I want it to be horny MILF's. Preferably asian.

>Im sure any psychologist would have a field day, or week , with me if I tried to explain this.
This enire site is an untapped mine of psychological oddities and unexplored abnormalities. I'm sure studying us is some PHD's wet dream.

I recently found out the girl I'm dating is a freak and a masochist herself. I'm going to see if I can convince her to bite or cut me. If not, I'll just see if she'll let me punch her.

I have defined\classified some of my "fantasy play fields" as a male masochist. This is fantasy as it's either illegal or lethal (or merely cost so much I'd need to be an oil company CEO) to do IRL.
>Medical Masochism: a doctor or surgeon girl puncturing me, giving me shocks, binding with strong threads the limbs, blood-letting, asphyxiation, etc
>Police masochism: maze ,or just pepper spray, being hit with baton and tonfa, forced to lick tactical boots, tasered, handcuffed and waterboarded, 4-point restraint + the previous ones
>Pro-wrestling death match: tied with barbed wire, thrown against cinder blocks, (non mercury) lighting bulb rods, flaming chairs from high up. Kicked ,punched, thrown and knee capped by a girl who actually knows how to fight
>"industrial femdom". A set row of girls in a sort of line, each pays a fee and whips me for 100, 200 times or whatever while im suspended by hooks. so on, they do various sadisms after paying some coins in a box. drip burning wax (500mm, etc), kick me 50 times ,so on. in an orderly, bureaucratic, monetized factory-masochist male type
Sorry if I make a horrible laundry lists of fetishes..each one is supposed to be a cohesive unit, not a mere stupid list. As I said in other post I hate bdsm as a cultural thing and the role of "dominatrix" is just insecure and ,honestly, not THAT GOOD a fantasy for the man to have.

>>18070
if a girl can outsmart me and outdominate me i'll take it and ask for more

if not i'll make her pay until one of us kills the other

I believe there are many masochistic submissive guys here. I am one of them. I watch all the pictures and dream of being one of the victims. And most of all i love hanging, slaughtering like an animal and beheading. One day i wish to die in one of these ways. Like a willing volunteer.

Personally I'm not into real Gore animated drawn and stuff like that is more my taste I can't do real stuff it turns me off and I wouldn't call myself the most empathetic or nonsidistic person

>>18838
I have been exposed to dead animals and seen them die in front of me a couple times. While it's true that the rolling eyes did really make me think on how it would be in fiction, the reality is that in the heat of the moment I was both disgusted and sad. So much that I couldn't even get close to the carcass. We are talking about animals here, if it was an human I would be even more disgusted because I would think it's just disrespectful. Now if it was a doll or something I would never sympathize with, then I would probably phantasize about it. But that's all, fantasy, I would feel remorseful it was a real corpse because I would think it had a family and so.

>>19069
> No, this is how all fiction works and this is fundamental issue with all fiction. which has no fix.
Then stop trying to fix it.

> you who is allergic to any negative emotion no matter how weak it is that's great but I rather prefer wider range of emotions than being stuck in never ever ending euphoria.
I'm not "allergic to any negative emotion", I look for comedy when I want to laugh and look for tragedy when I want to cry. You instead look at my comedy, find no crying and complain.

> it will be same for you as if now somebody wrote tragic story about those twins,(like how they suddenly die during a trip) that you not make you feel sad at all you would juts read it and possibly even jerk off on the tragedy and move to another.
Of course it can make me sad, because I can not only separate fiction from reality, but also one piece of fiction from another, an ability which you not only lack, but it seems you can't even imagine other people having it.

> If on the other hand you use original character then as author you sort of have power to kill them for real
No, you've just established before that all fiction is the same in this regard and it has no fix. Now you're contradicting yourself once again.


Comment too long, view post No.19119 to see the full comment.

>>19133

>I suggest that, no matter what Onix says next, you ignore it. You're in the right but this exchange is starting to derail an interesting thread.

Yeah at this point I'm seriously considering deleting all the off topic spam.

>>19119
Are you a masochist? I can't even begin to want to try to explain why not all fictional stories are linked to someone who clearly demonstrates a lack of mental capacity to understand basic abstract concepts.

Either he's trolling you, or fundamentally incapable of understanding what "fiction" is as a concept, and that's not something you're going to fix. Stop torturing yourself, unless the wounds you enjoy are self inflicted mental ones.

>>18838
I mostly numb myself. So if the criteria for getting me hard is met (attractive subject and right situation) then it doesn't really matter to me if it's real, I just push the "guilty feelings" into a box. Sometimes I feel bad after, but they're long dead, zero interest in doing anything to a real person or corpse, so guilt is minimal. Essentially I selectively dehumanize images under a very select set of feelings and conditions.

Like someone else said, most real stuff lacks quality, or doesn't meet my criteria. There isn't much to look at, the internet has been pretty sanitized of necrophilia content.

>>18808
i’d rather not. plenty of people are into illustrated guro exclusively and would be turned off by proximity to “the real thing.” and it’d suck for gurochan (which has stayed up fairly consistently for the past year, iirc) to get pulled down by a hosting and/or legal kerfuffle. this is coming from someone who likes real gore, btw, so i have no vendetta or anything.

it's not a matter of users getting turned off, but real thing simply being harder to host.

>>18793
Gorechan had child gore with barely mosaic-ed genitalia. That's probably a little illegal, but I dunno legals
It could be banned, but then the question of where to draw the line would rise

>>18818
Why not make a seperate board? 4chan has /gif/ for the real thing and everywhere else for drawn or generated.
>>18821
Draw the line at Japan's AoC.

>>18793
By all means, please do! There needs to be gore board again that's actually good.

>>19046
*a gore board, my bad

I think in theory /ai/ could host both gore and scat lora discussions, but the interest for gore is much higher, meaning scat threads there would fall off page 1 too quickly. If it gets like 1 post a week, it may as well be a general thread on /s/.
>>18952
It was originally created on /ai/, if we go with general thread it would need to be remade with a fitting OP for it. Then that Futaba lora can really just be posted in the general thread in one post.

>>18951
"In the interest of compromise"

AI stuff being allowed to exist in its own segregated board is already the compromise.

>>18972
The mod said that AI was allowed in the regular threads in /s/, something I imagine not everyone is happy about. Plus, as the person above said, having a general scat AI thread in /ai/ would be impractical given its lack of activity. It might be better to just have a general thread on /s/, with all AI posting being directed there so that it doesn't mix with the other threads.

I think Ai is generally fine in moderation but it can turn into spam easily because of very easy production.

so probably it should be ok to post some AI images anywhere but when it becomes overwhelming it has to go to another place because otherwise it will drown non AI content

>>18972
More boards is a bad idea if we want to make the job easier.

>>18888
>We're all just flesh, what gives one the right to do harm to another for personal pleasure?

Apparently >>18891 does.

>>17268
I would join and how have you been here since you were a kid. I found out about this site last year, it's so niche.

Nope. This is just fantasy to me. I couldn't live with myself if I harmed someone innocent.

>>18891
What about the anon who asks for loli to get its own board?

>>18985
yea i exagerated, I just see aoi specifically lecturing a lot of people here and I kinda like it. Thank you guys for fighting for our collective karma, love you

>>17076
>>17264
don't listen to them. This site wouldn't be the same without your schizo ramblings

Long story short, every site everywhere gets spambots but gurochan combines both an interest in materials that are already in a legal grey area or flat-out illegal in a lot of places and a lack of resources for proper defence against such infiltration (really you'd need a 24/7 professional mod team, and there's no way that can be done with what the gc staff have available) which makes the place attractive to people trying to sell illegal material.

On top of that there's a secondary problem specific to gurochan which is that one particular disgruntled ex-poster apparently goes on occasional cp-spamming sprees. Banning is useless on an anonymous image board so all the mods can do is remove the stuff when they see it, which can take several hours because again there's not enough of them to maintain a 24/7 watch and they all have other shit to do (afaik nobody here does this as their day job).

>>18899
What do you think about making their job easier?